Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

May 8, 2007 at 20:53 3 comments

Spider-Man 3 is supposedly one of the most expensive films ever. And it shows. So, it is impossible to not recommend seeing it, if nothing else just to see what kind of movie you get for unlimited funding. You do get an impressive movie. But not necessarily a good movie. The qualities of SM3 are obvious. It looks and sounds great. There are a lot of awesome action scenes. Bruce Campell has a small part. Yay for Bruce! Venom is in the movie! Spider-Man wears his black suite/parasite. So it should be just amazing, right? Wrong. Where the first two movies, and especially the second, managed to capture the dilemma of being spider-man, the hopelessness and the problems, this movie focuses too much of Parkers love for MJ, mechanically played by snaggle-tooth herself, Kirsten Dunst. The addition of Gwen Stacy does not really upset the balance either, and Bryce Dallas Howard doesn’t manage to capture the allure of Gwen anyhow. She just doesn’t fit the part. Topher Grace plays the bad guy much like McDonalds make gourmet food; it is hard to forget where they come from. Topher barely works in a sit-com, but not here. Tobey goes on auto pilot, and manages to do a decent spider-man. The fact that he looks like a complete fool when trying to be cool is certainly a well thought out plan.

The good stuff? Thomas Haden Church is very, very good. Bruce Campbell is always entertaining. The story is kind of weak, but that is expected, this is a movie based on a comic book. There are ample betrayal, action, things flying around, honesty, bravery and romance. And an ugly moped.

So where did the movie go wrong then? I think it gave up on the characters. One of the things that attracted me to the comic books (yes, I am a comic book fan) is the variety of the stories, and the depth of the characters. And, yes, the development. Here the way the characters develops are given from the beginning, no surprises, and really just a distance to travel between the action scenes. In short: Everyone loves spider-man in this movie. His life is working well. No big problems at home, no apparent financial problems. Kind of… the opposite of the spider-man we love from the comics, and the previous films. Sad, really.

Verdict: See (obviously you should see the movie anyhow, even if it isn’t good. It is, after all, ridiculously expensive).


Entry filed under: Media, Pop-culture, Reviews.

Movie Review: Catch And Release Review: LaptopCooler

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Spencer P  |  May 8, 2007 at 22:34

    I really enjoyed your review.
    I am not sure whether this is the final spiderman though. I’d really like to see more, as in the comics there are so many more vilans to use in the films. Out of all three this one was my favourite



  • 2. nohlberg  |  May 8, 2007 at 22:50

    Thanks! I agree, there will surely be more spider-man movies. Lots of good villains left, after all… Even if I find the spider-man comics to be a bit boring, actually. Not as good as other.

    What I would really like, if I am allowed to dream, is a movie (or why not a ten part mini-series, like Taken or Band of Brothers) based on the old classic “Marvel wars”.
    Using all the superheroes, fighting each others. Now THAT would be a spectacular!

  • […] details of the movie. If you want, you can read the thoughts/reviews of NYC Film Critic, splatr, Marcus Nohlberg and mrsauer. I you want, you can go to the Rotten Tomatoes page of “Spiderman 3″ and […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

RSS My twitter updates

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Subscribe to my blog using RSS


RSS Things I recommend reading now

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Right now:
May 2007

%d bloggers like this: